A recent post on Friendly Atheist comments on the use of two Christian models in an Atheist Billboard. The models want the sign down. Do they have a case?« Continue »
Atheist Billboard Using Christian Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a4b3/8a4b3a4fb059c257a4ffa665c0943f4812dfa729" alt=""
An organization dedicated to infusing logical reasoning and science into political discussions
A recent post on Friendly Atheist comments on the use of two Christian models in an Atheist Billboard. The models want the sign down. Do they have a case?« Continue »
The swastika, from Sanskrit svastika, meaning “good fortune” was, as the translation suggests, not originally a negative symbol, and the Nazis should not be allowed to destroy the symbol for all time. We need to re-appropriate it, or in the case of the Jews, appropriate it.« Continue »
Some people seem to have a very absurd notion of what counts as censorship. The first amendment protects the right to the free exchange of information. It does not guarantee you a venue. Private entities get to choose whether or not to facilitate your exchange of ideas or not.« Continue »
It is still uncertain who launched the attack against Sony, but there is a good chance that it was North Korea retaliating against “The Interview.”« Continue »
The first amendment, at first glance, seems to deal with a few separate topics. Surely freedom of speech and press are related, but how does religion fit in?« Continue »