An organization dedicated to infusing logical reasoning and science into political discussions
Practitioners of Satanism is trying to use religious freedom as an argument against the Texas law requiring abortions for fetuses. However, their argument fails to satisfy a reasonable level of burden of proof. « Continue »
Speech is protected under the first amendment, and always should be. This has presented a moral quandary. Is verbal bullying protected under the constitution? This article, which seeks to answer this question, was spurred by a discussion on Twitter with a group of people who could not accept that speech could be a form of violence.« Continue »
One day it was pointed out to me by a friend in the military that those in the military do not take an oath to the state, or really even to the President, but rather first and foremost an oath to defend the constitution.« Continue »
The swastika, from Sanskrit svastika, meaning “good fortune” was, as the translation suggests, not originally a negative symbol, and the Nazis should not be allowed to destroy the symbol for all time. We need to re-appropriate it, or in the case of the Jews, appropriate it.« Continue »
Dr. Ray Brown asked whether or not Jill Stein can be sued by contributors to her recent campaign to have votes recounted. The answer is “probably not.”« Continue »